Raphael Baltensperger vs Daniel Little Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baltensperger vs Little analysis and find out who is favored!
Raphael Baltensperger vs Daniel Little Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Baltensperger 1 - 0 Little
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baltensperger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Little has won 48.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baltensperger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Little has won 51.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baltensperger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Little has saved 62.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baltensperger has won 60% of matches played (W/L 3/ 2), with Little winning 40% (W/L 10/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baltensperger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 23/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 46/ 48). Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Baltensperger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2), where as Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Baltensperger winning 1 times and Little being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Baltensperger winning 2 and Little winning 0. The last match between Baltensperger and Little was at the M15 Quinta Do Lago, 03-11-2020, Q3, Hard with Raphael Baltensperger getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Baltensperger and Little have played a deciding set 0 times, with Baltensperger winning 0 times and Little 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Baltensperger winning 1, and Little 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baltensperger has played against opponents with an average rank of 124 while Little has played against players with an average rank of 98.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baltensperger has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Little has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baltensperger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Little has converted 43.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
900
Rank
676
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
843
Rank
564
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
55% (126-103)
Career Total W/L
56% (98-77)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (7-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Raphael Baltensperger vs Daniel Little For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Baltensperger VS Little
Baltensperger VS Little H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Raphael Baltensperger | Daniel Little |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Baltensperger VS Little H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Raphael Baltensperger | Daniel Little |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (14/15) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (140/133) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.59 |
Aces Total | 0 | 78 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.17 |
DFs Total | 0 | 23 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:28:17 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 56.36 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (500/853) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (366/500) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (171/353) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (28/65) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (308/837) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (6/6) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Raphael Baltensperger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Edouard Aubert
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Nicolas Kobelt
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Niklas Koch
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Maurus Malgiaritta
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
QF |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quentin Folliot
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
41%
(
38 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Mark Lajal
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Luc Fomba
Player
Daniel Little
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Little
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Little
Player
Demetris Azoides
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Little
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shintaro Imai
Player
Daniel Little
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Little
Player
Joshua Charlton
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
12
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(2) 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Little
Player
Mason Naumovski
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Baltensperger Vs Little Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Baltensperger are available here and Little photos here.